[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBCDao9L0knyF74nN0RsGB7xKoUG_jG6o_GifesMchhbKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 19:31:21 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Updated] PM/Freezer: Thaw only kernel threads if freezing
of kernel threads fails
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 11:36 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 04, 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/2012 04:29 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>
>>>> I have reworked the changelog of this patch to indicate that this fixes a
>>>> regression. Here is the updated patch:
>>>
>>> Well, I've already fixed that up in my tree, but thanks anyway. :-)
>>>
>>
>> Nicer if gurus open wider windows for patches received, no?
>>
>
>
> I am not quite sure what you meant by that, but just in case you got the
> wrong idea by any chance, let me clarify:
>
> Working with Rafael has *always* been an immensely pleasurable experience!
> There is absolutely no doubt in that :-)
>
> So there really is no reason to feel bad about the above incident :-)
>
Yes, no reason not to keep mind open.
Good weekend
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists