[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.v87mrdg83l0zgt@mpn-glaptop>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:34:15 +0100
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"Hillf Danton" <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] mm: compaction: export some of the functions
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>>
>> This commit exports some of the functions from compaction.c file
>> outside of it adding their declaration into internal.h header
>> file so that other mm related code can use them.
>>
>> This forced compaction.c to always be compiled (as opposed to being
>> compiled only if CONFIG_COMPACTION is defined) but as to avoid
>> introducing code that user did not ask for, part of the compaction.c
>> is now wrapped in on #ifdef.
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:40:08 +0100, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> What if both compaction and CMA are not enabled?
What about it? If both are enabled, both will be compiled and usable.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@...gle.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists