linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] irq_domain generalization and refinement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120205161348.GZ889@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:13:48 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] irq_domain generalization and refinement

On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 05:38:53PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> [120204 14:00]:
> > 
> > Actually, it turns out to be not that hard, because twl doesn't actually
> > make use of the IRQ domain stuff:
> > 
> > commit aeb5032b3f8b9ab69daa545777433fa94b3494c4
> > Author:     Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
> > AuthorDate: Mon Aug 29 16:20:23 2011 +0200
> > Commit:     Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> > CommitDate: Mon Jan 9 00:37:40 2012 +0100
> > 
> >     mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030
> > 
> >     [grant.likely@...retlab.ca: Fix IRQ_DOMAIN dependency in kconfig]
> > 
> > Adding any dependency - especially one which wouldn't be enabled - for
> > a new feature which wasn't required before is going to break existing
> > users, so this shouldn't have been done in the first place.
> > 
> > A better fix to preserve existing users would've been as below - yes
> > it means more ifdefs, but if irq domain is to remain a DT only thing
> > then we're going to end up with _lots_ of this stuff.
> > 
> > I'd much prefer to see irq domain become more widely available so it
> > doesn't require these ifdefs everywhere.
> 
> Your patch below looks like a correct fix to me to the problem
> you and Grazvydas are seeing:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

It's not quite correct, because OMAP4 has issues in this area as well
(which does select IRQ_DOMAIN but can be without OF.)  The result is
an oops from irq_domain_add() because domain->ops is NULL.

The right solution is three fold:

1. Wrap the bits of code in CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN
2. Get rid of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF there, so the 'ops' member can be
   initialized.
3. Fix the OMAP vp code not to oops when voltdm->pmic is NULL

which I have in my combined patch for fixing OMAP so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/