[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120205220951.247956479@pcw.home.local>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:10:31 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 42/91] cifs: fix possible memory corruption in CIFSFindNext
2.6.27-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
commit 9438fabb73eb48055b58b89fc51e0bc4db22fabd upstream.
The name_len variable in CIFSFindNext is a signed int that gets set to
the resume_name_len in the cifs_search_info. The resume_name_len however
is unsigned and for some infolevels is populated directly from a 32 bit
value sent by the server.
If the server sends a very large value for this, then that value could
look negative when converted to a signed int. That would make that
value pass the PATH_MAX check later in CIFSFindNext. The name_len would
then be used as a length value for a memcpy. It would then be treated
as unsigned again, and the memcpy scribbles over a ton of memory.
Fix this by making the name_len an unsigned value in CIFSFindNext.
Reported-by: Darren Lavender <dcl@...ine99.gbr.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Index: longterm-2.6.27/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
===================================================================
--- longterm-2.6.27.orig/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c 2012-02-05 22:34:33.755917316 +0100
+++ longterm-2.6.27/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c 2012-02-05 22:34:40.813915010 +0100
@@ -3649,7 +3649,8 @@
T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *parms;
char *response_data;
int rc = 0;
- int bytes_returned, name_len;
+ int bytes_returned;
+ unsigned int name_len;
__u16 params, byte_count;
cFYI(1, ("In FindNext"));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists