linux-kernel - /proc/self/mounts in chroot vs lxc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:43:12 +0100
From:	Harald Dunkel <harri@...ics.de>
To:	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: /proc/self/mounts in chroot vs lxc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi folks,

AFAIK /proc/mounts (-> self/mounts) is supposed to replace
/etc/mtab. Problem is: In a chroot it contains too much
(invalid) information about the parent's mount points. It is
very hard to figure out which lines are correct.

For lxc there seems to be no such problem, so I wonder if it
would be possible to extend this scheme to chroot?

I am not sure if this is a kernel or libc issue. Any helpful
comment would be highly appreciated.

Regards

Harri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8uQSAACgkQUTlbRTxpHjebAACcDv8p76s834XRmt24Abyi2lei
Bg4An2zTYIvKz8uD7iYZ3f46fymZ+Guk
=pYTm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/