linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Next gen kvm api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:56:21 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC:	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Next gen kvm api

On 02/05/2012 11:51 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:44:43AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 02/05/2012 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > Device model
> > > > ------------
> > > > Currently kvm virtualizes or emulates a set of x86 cores, with or
> > > > without local APICs, a 24-input IOAPIC, a PIC, a PIT, and a number of
> > > > PCI devices assigned from the host.  The API allows emulating the local
> > > > APICs in userspace.
> > > > 
> > > > The new API will do away with the IOAPIC/PIC/PIT emulation and defer
> > > > them to userspace.  Note: this may cause a regression for older guests
> > > > that don't support MSI or kvmclock.  Device assignment will be done
> > > > using VFIO, that is, without direct kvm involvement.
> > > > 
> > > So are we officially saying that KVM is only for modern guest
> > > virtualization? 
> > 
> > No, but older guests may have reduced performance in some workloads
> > (e.g. RHEL4 gettimeofday() intensive workloads).
> > 
> Reduced performance is what I mean. Obviously old guests will continue working.

I'm not happy about it either.

> > > Also my not so old host kernel uses MSI only for NIC.
> > > SATA and USB are using IOAPIC (though this is probably more HW related
> > > than kernel version related).
> > 
> > For devices emulated in userspace, it doesn't matter where the IOAPIC
> > is.  It only matters for kernel provided devices (PIT, assigned devices,
> > vhost-net).
> > 
> What about EOI that will have to do additional exit to userspace for each
> interrupt delivered?

I think the ioapic EOI is asynchronous wrt the core, yes?  So the vcpu
can just post the EOI broadcast on the apic-bus socketpair, waking up
the thread handling the ioapic, and continue running.  This trades off
vcpu latency for using more host resources.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/