| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:21:29 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>
CC: rpurdie@...ys.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Dajun Chen <Dajun.Chen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/07] LEDS: LED module for DA9052/53 PMIC v1
On 02/06/2012 01:42 PM, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> LED Driver for Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMICs.
[...]
> +
> +static int da9052_set_led_brightness(struct da9052_led *led)
> +{
> + u8 val;
> + int error;
> +
> + val = (led->brightness * 0x5f / LED_FULL) & 0x7f;
If the maximum brightness value is 0x5f, just set it as the max_brightness
field value, instead of scaling the value.
> + val |= DA9052_LED_CONT_DIM;
> +
> + error = da9052_reg_write(led->da9052, led_reg[led->led_index], val);
> + if (error < 0)
> + dev_err(led->da9052->dev, "Failed to set led brightness, %d\n",
> + error);
> + return error;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +
> +static int da9052_configure_leds(struct da9052_led *led)
Since this function doesn't confgiure one specific led I think it is better
to just pass the pointer to the da9052 struct instead of a led.
> +{
> + int error;
> + unsigned char register_value = DA9052_OPENDRAIN_OUTPUT | 1 << 3;
1 << 3 is sort of a magic value, would be nice to have either a comment
explaining what it does or have a define for it.
> +
> + error = da9052_reg_update(led->da9052, DA9052_GPIO_14_15_REG,
> + DA9052_MASK_LOWER_NIBBLE,
> + register_value);
> +
> + if (error < 0) {
> + dev_err(led->da9052->dev, "Failed to write GPIO 14-15 reg, %d\n",
> + error);
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + error = da9052_reg_update(led->da9052, DA9052_GPIO_14_15_REG,
> + DA9052_MASK_UPPER_NIBBLE,
> + register_value << DA9052_NIBBLE_SHIFT);
> + if (error < 0)
> + dev_err(led->da9052->dev, "Failed to write GPIO 14-15 reg, %d\n",
> + error);
> +
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit da9052_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
> + struct da9052 *da9052;
> + struct led_platform_data *pled;
> + struct da9052_led *led = NULL;
> + int error;
> + int i;
> +
> + da9052 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + pdata = da9052->dev->platform_data;
> + if (pdata == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n");
> + error = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_mem;
Nothing has been allocated yet, so there shouldn't be anything to free either.
> + }
> +
> + pled = pdata->pled;
> + if (pled == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed no platform data for LED\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + led = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct da9052_led) * pled->num_leds,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (led == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to alloc memory\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pled->num_leds; i++) {
> + led[i].cdev.name = pled->leds[i].name;
> + led[i].cdev.brightness_set = da9052_led_set;
> + led[i].cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
> + led[i].brightness = LED_OFF;
> + led[i].led_index = pled->leds[i].flags;
> + led[i].da9052 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + INIT_WORK(&led[i].work, da9052_led_work);
> +
> + error = led_classdev_register(pdev->dev.parent, &led[i].cdev);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register led %d\n",
> + led[i].led_index);
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> +
> + error = da9052_set_led_brightness(&led[i]);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to init led %d\n",
> + led[i].led_index);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> + error = da9052_configure_leds(led);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure GPIO Led,%d\n", error);
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, led);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_register:
> + for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + led_classdev_unregister(&led[i].cdev);
> + cancel_work_sync(&led[i].work);
> + }
> +err_mem:
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, led);
You shouldn't need this. If probe fails all devm resource will be freed.
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit da9052_led_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_led *led = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
> + struct da9052 *da9052;
> + struct led_platform_data *pled;
> + int i;
> +
> + da9052 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + pdata = da9052->dev->platform_data;
> + pled = pdata->pled;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pled->num_leds; i++) {
> + led[i].brightness = 0;
> + da9052_set_led_brightness(&led[i]);
> + led_classdev_unregister(&led[i].cdev);
> + cancel_work_sync(&led[i].work);
> + }
> +
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, led);
Neither this, that's the whole point of devm
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists