[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAORVsuW7mBCZdGqScX5jjaYDhijZH_H7vDKkJ4v6WWHn9rUsGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:42:00 +0100
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: markgross@...gnar.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@...com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] CPU C-state breakage with PM Qos change
Rafael,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Mark,
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
...
>> In kernel/power/Makefile:
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += main.o qos.o
>>
>> I guess that explains things. :-)
> Initially I thought we should have a way of disabling the feature on
> some (minimal) kernels and so thought CONFIG_PM was the option to use.
>
>> It's quite easy to make qos.o be independent of CONFIG_PM, in which case the
>> code added by Venki can be removed, so patches welcome (for 3.4, though).
> I am working on it, more to come soon.
I have a couple of patches ready, to be applied on 3.3-rc1 (so without
Venki's patch applied).
The first one is on PM QoS, the second one on per-device PM QoS. Is
the latter needed?
Please let me know and I will send them asap.
Regards,
Jean
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists