[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328547366.2220.83.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:56:06 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: steweg@...t.sk, gregory.v.rose@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v1, kernel version 3.2.1] rtnetlink workaround around
the skb buff size issue
Le lundi 06 février 2012 à 10:15 -0500, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Štefan Gula <steweg@...t.sk>
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:53:28 +0100
>
> > If I try to request for it, it will eventually fail with a lot of
> > records even with filtering...
>
> Then the user can loop increasing the buffer size until the netlink
> request succeeds.
>
> It is not a problem.
Actually we always truncate message in netlink_recvmsg()
We could use a MSG_NOPARTIAL flag in netlink_recvmsg() so that user can
avoid the MSG_PEEK operation to fetch next message length.
(Ie not consume/copy skb if user buffer is too small to hold full
message, and only return the needed length)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists