[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120206171721.GB6367@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:17:21 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
robert.richter@....com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock
granularity on AMD
Em Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:31:00PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 14:25 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> In summary, two issues:
> >> - Why is sched_clock_stable not set or even tested on recent AMD systems?
> >
> > I'll leave that for Robert to answer, also added Boris to the CC, him
> > know AMD bits too.
> >
> Ok, good.
>
> >> - perf should not rely on fine granularity timestamps in the re-ordering code
> >
> > Uhm, what else is there?
> I understand your point. I don't quite understand what the code is
> supposed to do for odered
> samples. I'd like Arnaldo to explain this warning first.
That code was written by Frédéric and IIRC also Thomas, its something I
plan to rework somehow in the future, but for now I'll let them chime
in... Frédéric?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists