lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:17:04 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	asharma@...com, ravitillo@....gov, vweaver1@...s.utk.edu,
	khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/18] perf: fix endianness detection in perf.data

Em Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 01:54:44PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> The current version of perf detects whether or not
> the perf.data file is written in a different endianness
> using the attr_size field in the header of the file. This
> field represents sizeof(struct perf_event_attr) as known
> to perf record. If the sizes do not match, then perf tries
> the byte-swapped version. If they match, then the tool assumes
> a different endianness.
> 
> The issue with the approach is that it assumes the size of
> perf_event_attr always has to match between perf record and
> perf report. However, the kernel perf_event ABI is extensible.
> New fields can be added to struct perf_event_attr. Consequently,
> it is not possible to use attr_size to detect endianness.
> 
> This patch takes another approach by using the magic number
> written at the beginning of the perf.data file to detect
> endianness. The magic number is an eight-byte signature.
> It's primary purpose is to identify (signature) a perf.data
> file. But it could also be used to encode the endianness.
> 
> The patch introduces a new value for this signature. The key
> difference is that the signature is written differently in
> the file depending on the endianness. Thus, by comparing the
> signature from the file with the tool's own signature it is
> possible to detect endianness. The new signature is "PERFILE2".
> 
> Backward compatiblity with existing perf.data file is
> ensured.

Looks ok, but IIRC David Ahern interacted with you on this specific
patch in the past, having his Acked-by and/or Tested-by would be great,
David?

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/header.c |   77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index ecd7f4d..6f4187d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -63,9 +63,20 @@ char *perf_header__find_event(u64 id)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static const char *__perf_magic = "PERFFILE";
> +/*
> + * magic2 = "PERFILE2"
> + * must be a numerical value to let the endianness
> + * determine the memory layout. That way we are able
> + * to detect endianness when reading the perf.data file
> + * back.
> + *
> + * we check for legacy (PERFFILE) format.
> + */
> +static const char *__perf_magic1 = "PERFFILE";
> +static const u64 __perf_magic2    = 0x32454c4946524550ULL;
> +static const u64 __perf_magic2_sw = 0x50455246494c4532ULL;
>  
> -#define PERF_MAGIC	(*(u64 *)__perf_magic)
> +#define PERF_MAGIC	__perf_magic2
>  
>  struct perf_file_attr {
>  	struct perf_event_attr	attr;
> @@ -1620,24 +1631,59 @@ int perf_header__process_sections(struct perf_header *header, int fd,
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int check_magic_endian(u64 *magic, struct perf_file_header *header,
> +			      struct perf_header *ph)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* check for legacy format */
> +	ret = memcmp(magic, __perf_magic1, sizeof(*magic));
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		pr_debug("legacy perf.data format\n");
> +		if (!header)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		if (header->attr_size != sizeof(struct perf_file_attr)) {
> +			u64 attr_size = bswap_64(header->attr_size);
> +
> +			if (attr_size != sizeof(struct perf_file_attr))
> +				return -1;
> +
> +			ph->needs_swap = true;
> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* check magic number with same endianness */
> +	if (*magic == __perf_magic2)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* check magic number but opposite endianness */
> +	if (*magic != __perf_magic2_sw)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	ph->needs_swap = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int perf_file_header__read(struct perf_file_header *header,
>  			   struct perf_header *ph, int fd)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
>  
> -	if (readn(fd, header, sizeof(*header)) <= 0 ||
> -	    memcmp(&header->magic, __perf_magic, sizeof(header->magic)))
> +	ret = readn(fd, header, sizeof(*header));
> +	if (ret <= 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	if (header->attr_size != sizeof(struct perf_file_attr)) {
> -		u64 attr_size = bswap_64(header->attr_size);
> -
> -		if (attr_size != sizeof(struct perf_file_attr))
> -			return -1;
> +	if (check_magic_endian(&header->magic, header, ph) < 0)
> +		return -1;
>  
> +	if (ph->needs_swap) {
>  		mem_bswap_64(header, offsetof(struct perf_file_header,
> -					    adds_features));
> -		ph->needs_swap = true;
> +			     adds_features));
>  	}
>  
>  	if (header->size != sizeof(*header)) {
> @@ -1873,8 +1919,13 @@ static int perf_file_header__read_pipe(struct perf_pipe_file_header *header,
>  				       struct perf_header *ph, int fd,
>  				       bool repipe)
>  {
> -	if (readn(fd, header, sizeof(*header)) <= 0 ||
> -	    memcmp(&header->magic, __perf_magic, sizeof(header->magic)))
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = readn(fd, header, sizeof(*header));
> +	if (ret <= 0)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	 if (check_magic_endian(&header->magic, NULL, ph) < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	if (repipe && do_write(STDOUT_FILENO, header, sizeof(*header)) < 0)
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists