linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/24] PCI: Add busn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo6=t1XtdUMBAn7Ag5XNLS3wKueybfrsUzmht6GL9XSGLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:59:12 -0800
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] PCI: Add busn_res operation functions

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> will use them insert/update busn res in pci_bus
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index a114173..8d4de5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1622,6 +1622,48 @@ err_out:
>        return NULL;
>  }
>
> +void pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int bus_max)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = &b->busn_res;
> +       struct resource *parent_res = &iobusn_resource;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       res->start = busn(pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> +       res->end = busn(pci_domain_nr(b), bus_max);
> +       res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> +
> +       if (!pci_is_root_bus(b))
> +               parent_res = &b->parent->busn_res;
> +
> +       ret = insert_resource(parent_res, res);
> +
> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &b->dev,
> +                       "busn_res: %pR %s inserted under %pR\n",
> +                       res, ret ? "can not be" : "is", parent_res);
> +}
> +
> +void pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int bus_max)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = &b->busn_res;
> +       struct resource old_res = *res;
> +
> +       res->end = busn_update_bus_nr(res->end, bus_max);

I think this design is a mistake.  Here's what you're doing:

  - initialize struct resource (keys are "start" and "end")
  - insert into tree (placed in tree by kernel/resource.c based on
"start" and "end")
  - update "end"

You "know" in this case that the update is safe because the caller has
validated "bus_max."  But that still breaks the kernel/resource.c
encapsulation.  If we change the kernel/resource.c implementation,
this code might break.

I think it would be better to remove the bus resource from the tree,
change its "end," then re-insert it.

> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &b->dev,
> +                       "busn_res: %pR end updated to %pR\n",
> +                       &old_res, res);
> +}
> +
> +void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = &b->busn_res;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = release_resource(res);
> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &b->dev,
> +                       "busn_res: %pR %s released\n",
> +                       res, ret ? "can not be" : "is");
> +}
> +
>  struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 94ad468..3da935c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -665,6 +665,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                                    struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
>                                    struct list_head *resources);
> +void pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int busmax);
> +void pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int busmax);
> +void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b);
>  struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                                             struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
>                                             struct list_head *resources);
> --
> 1.7.7
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/