[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328556916.2200.29.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:35:16 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarapov@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ftrace, perf: Add support to use function
tracepoint in perf
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 14:21 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> struct ftrace_event_call __used event_##call = { \
> > @@ -170,4 +179,9 @@ struct ftrace_event_call __used event_##call = { \
> > struct ftrace_event_call __used \
> > __attribute__((section("_ftrace_events"))) *__event_##call = &event_##call;
> >
> > +#undef FTRACE_ENTRY
> > +#define FTRACE_ENTRY(call, struct_name, etype, tstruct, print) \
> > + FTRACE_ENTRY_REG(call, struct_name, etype, \
> > + PARAMS(tstruct), PARAMS(print), NULL)
> > +
> > #include "trace_entries.h"
>
>
> Yeah looks good. I wouldn't mind having only FTRACE_ENTRY() with one
> more parameter but I'm fine with the two macros as well.
I prefer the two macros. It's cleaner.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists