[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328601068.2482.46.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:51:08 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
robert.richter@....com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock
granularity on AMD
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 13:19 -0800, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
>
> Yes. If these two flags are set, TSC should be consistent and sched_clock_stable
> could be set and it will be reset if there is a call to mark_tsc_unstable().
Only trouble is that sched_clock_cpu() et al. will jump when you flip
sched_clock_stable to 0 after you started using it.. its something we
might want to fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists