linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix assertion failure in x86_pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328603689.2476.15.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:34:49 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
	markus@...ppelsdorf.de, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix assertion failure in x86_pmu_start()

Le lundi 06 février 2012 à 21:53 +0100, Stephane Eranian a écrit :
> The following patch fixes an issue introduced by the following
> commit:
>         e050e3f0a71b ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling")
> 
> The patch caused the following warning to pop up depending on
> the sampling frequency adjustments:
> 
> [89214.962603] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [89214.967441] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:995 x86_pmu_start+0x79/0xd4()
> [89214.975825] Hardware name: X8DTN
> [89214.979268] Modules linked in:
> [89214.982560] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/6 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-tip+ #1
> [89214.988865] Call Trace:
> [89214.991533]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81065cc7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7e/0x97
> [89214.998379]  [<ffffffff81065cf5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
> [89215.004428]  [<ffffffff8103f626>] x86_pmu_start+0x79/0xd4
> [89215.010042]  [<ffffffff810e30d1>] perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context.part.63+0xef/0x123
> [89215.018123]  [<ffffffff810e318c>] perf_event_task_tick+0x87/0x1c1
> [89215.024463]  [<ffffffff810a2370>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xda/0xda
> [89215.030595]  [<ffffffff8108b819>] scheduler_tick+0xd1/0xf3
> [89215.036296]  [<ffffffff810720b0>] update_process_times+0x5e/0x6f
> [89215.042512]  [<ffffffff810a23e0>] tick_sched_timer+0x70/0x99
> [89215.048387]  [<ffffffff810823f9>] __run_hrtimer+0x8c/0x148
> [89215.054087]  [<ffffffff81082add>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xc1/0x18c
> 
> It was caused by the following call sequence:
> 
> perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context.part() {
>      stop()
>      if (delta > 0) {
>           perf_adjust_period() {
>               if (period > 8*...) {
>                   stop()
>                   ...
>                   start()
>               }
>           }
>       }
>       start()
> }
> 
> Which caused a double start and a double stop, thus triggering the assert
> in x86_pmu_start().
> 
> The patch fixes the problem by avoiding the double calls. We pass a new
> argument to perf_adjust_period() to indicate whether or not the event
> is already stopped. We can't just remove the start/stop from that function
> because it's called from __perf_event_overflow where the event needs to
> be reloaded via a stop/start back-toback call.
> 
> The patch reintroduces the assertion in x86_pmu_start() which was removed
> by commit:
> 	84f2b9b perf: Remove deprecated WARN_ON_ONCE()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---

This indeed fix the WARNING for me

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

But I still have these messages when doing a perf session.

Machine seems to recover properly.

Previous kernels were working without notice.

[  300.553017] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 2.
[  300.553071] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  300.553115] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  300.775014] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 1.
[  300.775064] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  300.775107] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  303.250012] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 0.
[  303.250067] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  303.250110] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  303.278012] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 7.
[  303.278063] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  303.278106] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  305.839016] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU 5.
[  305.839068] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  305.839112] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  305.907013] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 4.
[  305.907066] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  305.907109] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  306.953017] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 1.
[  306.953069] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  306.953111] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  308.585014] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 6.
[  308.585064] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  308.585108] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  309.239012] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 0.
[  309.239079] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  309.239137] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  309.426009] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU 7.
[  309.426075] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  309.426132] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
[  309.592010] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU 2.
[  309.592076] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
[  309.592133] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/