[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F31298C.5090008@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:24 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] MFD: twl6040: Convert to i2c driver, and separate
it from twl core
On 02/07/2012 03:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> and it looks like you'll save a bunch more code if you're able to
> convert over to using a regmap cache. Note that as a first pass you
> just need to define which registers are volatile and enable a cache type
> - if defaults are omitted then the values will be read back from the
> device to start off with.
There's one thing which I need to sort out before I enable the regmap
cache for the twl6040 MFD (and remove all other caching of vibra
controls in the MFD, and from the ASoC codec driver):
In the codec driver I have one 'shadow' register which does not exist on
the HW. I'm going to need to have access to that shadow register's bits
in the future transparently.
I was wondering if we could add support to regmap for such SW only
registers. This would only make sens if the cache is enabled. We could
have a callback let's say shadow_reg() in remap_config struct. If it is
a shadow reg we never reach out for the HW and operate only on the cache.
Is this something we can add to regmap?
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists