[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0CE8B6BE3C4AD74AB97D9D29BD24E552028C2A7B@CORPEXCH1.na.ads.idt.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 06:19:04 -0800
From: "Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/11] dmaengine: add context parameter toprep_slave_sgand prep_dma_cyclic
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 9:14 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 06:01 -0800, Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
> > Currently function private_candidate() allows filtering function
> > not to be specified and therefore skip the filter check.
> > It may be a good safety measure to ensure that channels specified
> > as DMA_SLAVE_EXT provide a corresponding filter routine so they
> > positively identify dma channel that will accept intended extra
> > parameter.
> > I assume that a system may have more than one dmac registered as
> > DMA_SLAVE_EXT.
> >
> > This is what I have for RapidIO - the filter call ensures that DMA
> > channel is associated with a RapidIO controller that provides access
> > to the specified SRIO device.
> For slave-dma it's better to have a filter :)
Better, but it can get away without it ;))
Alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists