[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328578400.21268.76.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:33:20 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>, mroos@...ux.ee
Subject: Re: [patch]block: fix ioc locking warning
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 09:10 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 16:59 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:43:50AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > Quite simple, copy kernel source to tmpfs in tight memory environment.
> > > This will trigger swap. The bisection result appears stable.
> >
> > Looked through the commit again but it really doesn't change fast
> > paths. The only paths which can be slower are ioc and q exits. Can
> > you please do the followings?
> >
> > * Share the script used for microbench. Maybe it somehow exposes
> > slower exit path? How much regression are we talking about?
> I need strip the script out from our test framework, but it essentially
> is a 'time copy -a tmpfs/kernelsource tmpfs/copy'. The time increased
> ~20% with 3.3-rc1.
oops, I get confused about our swap and swap-cp test. The workload with
regression is swap. which does 'time kernelbuild tmpfs/kernelsource'. we
run several such kernelbuild in the meantime to trigger swap. Very sorry
to give your wrong info before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists