[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwv0WjXdz2SDKgzapCjm-b1mK=yFBW4PxnDGXorvTNpRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:34:48 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>, mroos@...ux.ee
Subject: Re: [patch]block: fix ioc locking warning
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 16:59 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> * Test with the this_q != locked_q trylock patch.
> this one slightly reduces the regression. without it, the regression is
> about 17%, with it, the regression is about 12%. Test result is stable.
What happens when you remove the fast-case entirely?
See the other patch by Tejun with the subject "[PATCH] block: strip
out locking optimization in put_io_context()"
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists