lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120207221924.GH6346@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:19:24 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kexec-list <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path

On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:24:46PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Eric, brought up a point that because the boot code was restructured we may
> > > not need to disable the io apic any more in the crash path.  The original
> > > concern that led to the development of disable_IO_APIC, was that the TSC
> > > calibration on boot up relied on the PIT timer for reference.  Access
> > > to the PIT required 8259 interrupts to be working.  This wouldn't work
> > > if the ioapic needed to be configured.  So on panic path, the ioapic was
> > > reconfigured to use virtual wire mode to allow the 8259 to passthrough.
> > 
> > A small clarification originally it was the jiffies calibration that
> > would fail if we could cause the PIT to generate interrupts through the
> > 8259.  The boot would then hang at calibrating jiffies.
> 
> Ok.  Thanks!

So now what has changed? Do we setup LAPIC and IOAPIC early enough to
receive PIT interrupts in regular mode (non-virtual wire mode) or
something else?

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ