linux-kernel - Re: An extremely simplified pinctrl bindings proposal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F30B79C.4030404@nvidia.com>
Date:	Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:33:16 -0800
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To:	Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com>
CC:	Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>,
	"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@...aro.org)" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer (s.hauer@...gutronix.de)" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
	"Simon Glass (sjg@...omium.org)" <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	"Grant Likely (grant.likely@...retlab.ca)" 
	<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"ext Tony Lindgren (tony@...mide.com)" <tony@...mide.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: An extremely simplified pinctrl bindings proposal

On 02/06/2012 11:05 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> I like the general approach of simplifying the pinctrl thing, as the 
> previous approach did not appear to be converging.
> 
> One possible name would be "gpconfig" - for general purpose configuration.

Sounds reasonable

> The register access model in the strawman proposal is probably too 
> simple.  32-bit memory mapped registers are certainly the most common 
> subcase on ARM, but there are many other cases that occur in practice:
> 
> * Registers that must be accessed with 8, 16, or 64-bit cycles.
> * Registers that have side effects on read, so read-mask-write must be 
> avoided
> * Registers accessed via an index/data cycle pair, thus having locking 
> requirements
> * Registers that must be read after being written, or otherwise 
> requiring some sort of memory-ordering enforcement.
> * Time delays between pairs of writes
> * PCI configuration registers, which often have some combination of the 
> above
> * Registers behind serial buses like I2C
> 
> Both Open Firmware and ACPI have addressed this general problem.  In 
> addition to a numeric identifier for the register, you need to specify 
> the access semantics.  It's difficult to finitely enumerate all possible 
> cases, but you can get to 99.9% with a modest number of access models, 
> and then add new models as needed.

My thinking was that each driver that permitted execution of these
register write sequences on its registers would provide an extremely
simple driver to support this. Perhaps just one "op" function that
implemented each write, and took care of details such as timing delays
for the IO, indexed addressing, using I2C instead of memory-mapped,
perhaps register access width, etc.

Some of the items in the list above could be solved by explicit flags in
the data instead (register access width comes to mind for memory-mapped
devices at least).

Do you have any direct pointers to how OF and ACPI solved this kind of
thing; it'd be good background.

-- 
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/