[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F32303D.9090003@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:20:13 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus 1/2] block: separate out blk_rq_merge_ok()
and blk_try_merge() from elevator functions
On 02/08/2012 12:01 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blk_rq_merge_ok() is the elevator-neutral part of merge eligibility
> test. blk_try_merge() determines merge direction and expects the
> caller to have tested elv_rq_merge_ok() previously.
>
> elv_rq_merge_ok() now wraps blk_rq_merge_ok() and then calls
> elv_iosched_allow_merge(). elv_try_merge() is removed and the two
> callers are updated to call elv_rq_merge_ok() explicitly followed by
> blk_try_merge(). While at it, make rq_merge_ok() functions return
> bool.
>
> This is to prepare for plug merge update and doesn't introduce any
> behavior change.
>
> This is based on Jens' patch to skip elevator_allow_merge_fn() from
> plug merge.
Thanks for finishing it up and testing, I have applied both patches.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists