linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/21] posix_types: Remove fd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8328.1328703626@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:20:26 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] posix_types: Remove fd_set macros

H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> However, they are nothing but standard (nonatomic) bit operations, and
> we already have optimized versions of bit operations in the kernel.
> We can't include <linux/bitops.h> in <asm/posix_types.h> but we can
> move the definitions to <linux/time.h> and define them there in terms
> of standard kernel bitops.

Why linux/time.h?  Why not linux/poll.h?  That would seem a more appropriate
place for them.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/