linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed address is invalid"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328705209.3718.1.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed
 address is invalid"

On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:16 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Does your new patch apply cleanly on top of the revert? If not 
> > then please send an updated one, so that we can investigate its 
> > effects.
> 
> Good point, it doesn't apply cleanly. Here's an updated version rebased
> against Linus' tree.

Ping? Keith, have you had chance to test this patch yet?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/