[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120208144506.GI5938@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:45:06 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve
pages
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:27:56AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Pages allocated from the reserve are returned with page->pfmemalloc
> > set and it is up to the caller to determine how the page should be
> > protected. SLAB restricts access to any page with page->pfmemalloc set
>
> pfmemalloc sounds like a page flag. If you would use one then the
> preservation of the flag by copying it elsewhere may not be necessary and
> the patches would be less invasive.
Using a page flag would simplify parts of the patch. The catch of course
is that it requires a page flag which are in tight supply and I do not
want to tie this to being 32-bit unnecessarily.
> Also you would not need to extend
> and modify many of the structures.
>
Lets see;
o struct page size would be unaffected
o struct kmem_cache_cpu could be left alone even though it's a small saving
o struct slab also be left alone
o struct array_cache could be left alone although I would point out that
it would make no difference in size as touched is changed to a bool to
fit pfmemalloc in
o It would still be necessary to do the object pointer tricks in slab.c
to avoid doing an excessive number of page lookups which is where much
of the complexity is
o The virt_to_slab could be replaced by looking up the page flag instead
and avoiding a level of indirection that would be pleasing
to an int and placed with struct kmem_cache
I agree that parts of the patch would be simplier although the
complexity of storing pfmemalloc within the obj pointer would probably
remain. However, the downside of requiring a page flag is very high. In
the event we increase the number of page flags - great, I'll use one but
right now I do not think the use of page flag is justified.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists