linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120208152750.GA15782@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:27:50 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	San Mehat <san@...gle.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware

On 02/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:32PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > Some __cond_lock() caller are inline functions. Is this bad?
>
> No, that's great, actually. :-) Not obvious, but seems like
> sparse understands __cond_lock in inline functions, so I'd
> better use it.

Hmm, great...

may be you can update lock_task_sighand() too ? (in a separate
patch of course).

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/