[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F329953.9010608@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:48:35 +0100
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
CC: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@...il.com>, <balbi@...com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<khali@...ux-fr.org>, <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
<w.sang@...gutronix.de>, <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: OMAP: fix build breakage when CONFIG_OF is not set
Hi Luca,
On 2/8/2012 12:25 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 16:42 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Luciano Coelho<coelho@...com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:59 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>>>>> Since commit 6145197be6cc0583fa1a2f4ec1079d366137061e, building
>>>>
>>>> we generally like to see the commit subject here too. And adding the
>>>> abbreviated commit instead of the full sha1, wouldn't hurt either ;-)
>>>
>>> Ok, different practices. :)
>>
>> However there was already a discurssion.
>> Anyways thanks for the patch.
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/69796
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I'll send v2.
>> I think there was already a fix for this.
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg63151.html
>>
>> Anyways thanks for the patch.
>
> Ah, okay. Thanks for the info, I hadn't seen these.
Yeah, it looks like the OMAP fixes missed -rc2, but Tony sent the pull
request [1].
Regards,
Benoit
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg63564.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists