[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F32A8F1.1080001@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:55:13 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
CC: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] s390: Use generic posix_types.h
On 02/08/2012 01:04 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:09:00 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>>
>> Change the s390 architecture to use <asm-generic/posix_types.h>.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: <linux390@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h | 70 +++++------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> I carefully checked the conversion and came to the conclusion that the new type
> definitions are equivalent to the old ones. The code compiles fine with the
> patches applied and the kernel boots.
> What I don't like is the conversion of __FD_ZERO. The new definition creates
> this code sequence:
>
It shouldn't matter:
a. __FD_ZERO seems to actually be unused in the current kernel.
b. The last patch in the series deletes the generic __FD_ZERO and
replaces it with memset(). If there are any magic optimizations an
architecture wants to do, they belong in memset().
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists