lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:10:58 +0800
From:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity

From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

In original code, using account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue
as a pair will do some work unnecessary, such like remove node from list
and add it back again immediately.

And because there are no really enqueue and dequeue happen here, it is not
suitable to use account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue here.

This patch combine the work of them in order to save time.

v2:
	Add more description and revise wrong code.

v3:
	Mark add_cfs_task_weight and sub_add_cfs_task_weight as inline. 

Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7c6414f..8726750 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -777,16 +777,28 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
  */
 
 #if defined CONFIG_SMP && defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void
+static inline void
 add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long weight)
 {
 	cfs_rq->task_weight += weight;
 }
+
+static inline void
+sub_add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long sub, unsigned long add)
+{
+	cfs_rq->task_weight -= sub;
+	cfs_rq->task_weight += add;
+}
 #else
 static inline void
 add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long weight)
 {
 }
+
+static inline void
+sub_add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long sub, unsigned long add)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 static void
@@ -938,20 +950,24 @@ static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 }
 # endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
 static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
 			    unsigned long weight)
 {
+	/* commit outstanding execution time */
+	if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
+		update_curr(cfs_rq);
+
 	if (se->on_rq) {
-		/* commit outstanding execution time */
-		if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
-			update_curr(cfs_rq);
-		account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
+		update_load_sub_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight, weight);
+		if (!parent_entity(se)) {
+			update_load_sub_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight, weight);
+		}
+		if (entity_is_task(se)) {
+			sub_add_cfs_task_weight(cfs_rq, se->load.weight, weight);
+		}
 	}
-
 	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);
-
-	if (se->on_rq)
-		account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
 }
 
 static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 98c0c26..ec4430f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -779,6 +779,14 @@ static inline void update_load_sub(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long dec)
 	lw->inv_weight = 0;
 }
 
+static inline void update_load_sub_add(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long dec,
+					unsigned long inc)
+{
+	lw->weight -= dec;
+	lw->weight += inc;
+	lw->inv_weight = 0;
+}
+
 static inline void update_load_set(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long w)
 {
 	lw->weight = w;
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ