lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328737168.2903.35.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:39:28 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, aik@...abs.ru,
	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Device isolation group infrastructure (v3)

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 16:27 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Again, device grouping is done by the IOMMU drivers, so this all
> belongs
> into the generic iommu-code rather than the driver core.

Except that there isn't really a "generic iommu code"... discovery,
initialization & matching of iommu vs. devices etc... that's all
implemented in the arch specific iommu code.

Cheers,
Ben.
  
> I think it makes sense to introduce a device->iommu pointer which
> depends on CONFIG_IOMMU_API and put the group information into it.
> This also has the benefit that we can consolidate all the
> device->arch.iommu pointers into device->iommu as well.
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ