linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC G-U-P experts] IB/umem: Modernize our get_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:10:17 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
cc:	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC G-U-P experts] IB/umem: Modernize our get_user_pages()
 parameters

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Which I think explains why the code is the way it is.  But clearly
> > we could do better if we had a better way of telling GUP our real
> > intentions -- ie the FOLL_READONLY_COW flag.
> 
> You've persuaded me.  Yes, you have been using force because that was
> the only tool available at the time, to get close to the sensible
> behaviour you are now asking for.
> 
> > 
> > > Can you, for example, enforce the permissions set up by the user?
> > > I mean, if they do the ibv_reg_mr() on a private readonly area,
> > > so __get_user_pages with the FOLL_APPROPRIATELY flag will fault
> > > in ZERO_PAGEs, can you enforce that RDMA will never spray data
> > > into those pages?
> > 
> > Yes, the access flags passed into ibv_reg_mr() are enforced by
> > the RDMA hardware, so if no write access is request, no write
> > access is possible.
> 
> Okay, if you enforce the agreed permissions in hardware, that's fine.

A doubt assaulted me overnight: sorry, I'm back to not understanding.

What are these access flags passed into ibv_reg_mr() that are enforced?
What relation do they bear to what you will pass to __get_user_pages()?

You are asking for a FOLL_FOLLOW ("follow permissions of the vma") flag,
which automatically works for read-write access to a VM_READ|VM_WRITE vma,
but read-only access to a VM_READ-only vma, without you having to know
which permission applies to which range of memory in the area specified.

But you don't need that new flag to set up read-only access, and if you
use that new flag to set up read-write access to an area which happens to
contain VM_READ-only ranges, you have set it up to write into ZERO_PAGEs.

?Hugh?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/