[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:53:50 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable"
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:29:05 GMT, David Howells said:
> +#define ENOAUTHSERVICE 139 /* Authentication service not available */
>
> #define EHWPOISON 139 /* Memory page has hardware error */
Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)?
Just checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the
collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists