[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120209082722.GD16600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:57:22 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3.3-rc2 1/9] uprobes: Install and remove
breakpoints.
> >>
> >
> > I am confused by why we need to call insn_get_length(insn) before
> > checking insn->rex_prefix.nbytes? Is it needed.
>
> Ah, certainly, no, if the insn is already decoded.
Okay,
> >
> > uprobe->arch_info.rip_rela_target_address = 0x0;
> > if (!insn_rip_relative(insn))
> > return;
>
> Here, I think it is better to add a comment that
> insn_rip_relative() decodes until modrm. :)
Will do.
>
> > return;
> > }
>
> Confirmed, this looks good to me ;)
>
> Thanks!
Okay, Thanks for confirming,
Do you have a handy instruction whose REX.B is set that I could use to test.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists