[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202091318.36264.danny.kukawka@bisect.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:18:35 +0100
From: Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka@...ect.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/50] set addr_assign_type to NET_ADDR_RANDOM if a random mac address get assigned to a netdevice
On Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2012, David Miller wrote:
> 50 patches is way too many patches to submit and expect people
> to review at one time.
>
> You must do one of two things:
>
> 1) Condense the series down to a smaller number of more managable
> patches. Perhaps combine all the completely trivial conversion
> cases into one single patch, and post the non-trivial cases
> seperately.
>
> 2) Only submit a few of these changes at a time, not all at once.
>
> It's your choice, but what you did here is unacceptable.
Could you at least comment on these points from the cover letter, before I
change/update the patches?
- Should NET_ADDR_RANDOM get reset (to NET_ADDR_PERM) if the MAC address
get changed via SIOCSIFHWADDR/.ndo_set_mac_address and was random before?
- Would it make sense to add a new state (e.g. NET_ADDR_USERSPACE)
if the net address get changed via SIOCSIFHWADDR/.ndo_set_mac_address
from userspace?
Thanks,
Danny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists