[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120209133101.GC8830@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:31:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, emunson@...bm.net,
imunsie@....ibm.com, eranian@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect
annotation
* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:40 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:55:35PM +1100, Anton Blanchard escreveu:
> > >
> > > A perf annotate of a kernel function written in assembly shows
> > > very strange percentages:
> >
> > Thanks! I think this is the same problem Mike Galbraith noticed and
> > reported me (I guess that was in a private message), Mike, can you
> > please test it so that I can add more Foo-by stamps to this one?
>
> Sorry for the slow response (bz bz).
>
> I don't see that problem, but perf top annotation isn't
> working properly in tip at least. It seems to have forgotten
> how to average, seems to be clearing hit counts at every
> screen refresh or something.
hm, seems to work fine here. We used to have such a bug recently
(as of a few weeks [days?] ago), but latest -tip does not show
those symptoms.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists