[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBRdbn+UasvWgVco-NZ_LasFeG+7bLzTDVcQO-e6J+AW-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:53:14 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add sanity check on addr in symbol__inc_addr_samples()
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> Em Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:30:16AM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>>
>> Check the value of addr against the bounds of the symbol.
>> This is needed given we compute an offset:
>> offset = addr - sym->start
>>
>> And we don't want the offset to become negative.
>
> I'll try and add a debug option to show the backtrace and values of
> addr, sym, etc, so that we can fix the real problem.
>
> I.e. this function shouldn't be receiving any such invalid addresses, as
> the symbol lookup was done, the symbol was found to be this one, then
> why it would be out of bounds at this point?!
>
I tend to agree with you on this. But then I don't see why the first test
was there.
> - Arnaldo
>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> index 011ed26..8248d80 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ int symbol__inc_addr_samples(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
>>
>> pr_debug3("%s: addr=%#" PRIx64 "\n", __func__, map->unmap_ip(map, addr));
>>
>> - if (addr >= sym->end)
>> + if (addr >= sym->end || addr < sym->start)
>> return 0;
>>
>> offset = addr - sym->start;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists