[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo47+kHmS6477Bne84rPiy+sHGjgtK3mpk6VJc+hM4hhbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:42:59 -0800
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, trenn@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix logic for removing mappings in 'acpi_unmap'
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>
>
> Make sure the removal of mappings uses the same logic that put the
> mappings in place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 412a1e0..5aef087 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void acpi_unmap(acpi_physical_address pg_off, void __iomem *vaddr)
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> pfn = pg_off >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - if (page_is_ram(pfn))
> + if (should_use_kmap(pfn))
> kunmap(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> else
> iounmap(vaddr);
>
Whatever happened to the question of why we have arch-specific
ioremap() behavior? It's good to make map/unmap symmetric, but it'd
be better to get rid of the ioremap/kmap hack.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists