[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328758224.2200.134.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:30:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (trace/events/sunrpc.h)
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:14 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> Hmm.... How about if we rather take that out of the RPC_DEBUG condition?
> I'm assuming that if someone compiles in the tracepoint code, then they
> want to be able to do a full trace independently of whether or not they
> set CONFIG_SYSCTL.
Works for me.
>
> 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
> From d051b60dcc3032b71cf8d9b96ac4bf24f12b6dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:01:15 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Ensure that we can trace waitqueues when
> !defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
>
> The tracepoint code relies on the queue->name being defined in order to
> be able to display the name of the waitqueue on which an RPC task is
> sleeping.
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
> net/sunrpc/sched.c | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists