lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:04:07 -0700
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
CC:	acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Allow multiple threads or processes in record,
 stat, top

On 02/08/2012 10:36 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Oh, I meant this:
> 
> static struct thread_map *thread_map__new_by_pid_str(const char *pid_str)
> {
> 	...
> 	while (*str) {
> 		...
> 		tmp = thread_map__new_by_pid(pid);
> 		...
> 	}
> 	...
> }
> 
> static struct thread_map *thread_map__new_by_tid_str(const char *tid_str)
> {
> 	...
> 	while (*str) {
> 		...
> 		tmp = thread_map__new_by_tid(tid);
> 		...
> 	}
> 	...
> }


I'm still not seeing the code simplification here. For example,
new_by_tid(tid) allocates threads, sets the first element (it only
supports one) and returns it. In new_by_tid_str we loop over a CSV,
allocating/re-allocating on additional and then setting the current i-th
tid as opposed to the 0th element.

Similarly, for pid.

Personally, I liked my first patch better which dropped the current
tid/pid functions; they are only used by perf-test and it can be updated
to convert getpid() to a string and use the new API.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ