[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVxJT92s+XptSm+aNcbhNi0ovEwT0PSSCTiq=VYsbKDRKQWdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:58:25 +0200
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] slab: introduce kmalloc_array
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> Also, it could be written more "robust" against people who will make
>> sizeof() the first argument with __builtin_constant_p().
No,
If one dimension is constant, limit should be divided by it, so
compiler would have less chance
to screw up compile time evaluation.
Also, gfp_t mask could be made first argument if we ever want to
expand it to >2 dimensional arrays
without adding kaalloc3().
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(n));
>
> or
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(n) && !__builtin_constant_p(size));
>
> - xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists