[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1328884991-23889-2-git-send-email-vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:43:07 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: don't modify flags on PTRACE_SETOPTIONS failure
On ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, <opts>), we used to set
those option bits which are known, and then fail with -EINVAL
if there are some unknown bits in <opts>.
This in inconsistent with typical error handling, which
does not change any state if input is invalid.
This patch changes PTRACE_SETOPTIONS behavior so that
in this case, we return -EINVAL and don't change any bits
in task->ptrace.
It's very unlikely that there is userspace code in the wild which
will be affected by this change: it should have the form
ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_BOGUSOPT)
where PTRACE_O_BOGUSOPT is a constant unknown to the kernel.
But kernel headers, naturally, don't contain any
PTRACE_O_BOGUSOPTs, thus the only way userspace can use one
if it defines one itself. I can't see why anyone would do such
a thing deliberately.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/ptrace.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 00ab2ca..273f56e 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -528,6 +528,9 @@ int ptrace_writedata(struct task_struct *tsk, char __user *src, unsigned long ds
static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long data)
{
+ if (data & ~(unsigned long)PTRACE_O_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
child->ptrace &= ~PT_TRACE_MASK;
if (data & PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD)
@@ -551,7 +554,7 @@ static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long data)
if (data & PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT)
child->ptrace |= PT_TRACE_EXIT;
- return (data & ~PTRACE_O_MASK) ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ return 0;
}
static int ptrace_getsiginfo(struct task_struct *child, siginfo_t *info)
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists