linux-kernel - Re: bisected: 'perf top' causing soft lockups under Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328894901.25989.20.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:28:21 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: bisected: 'perf top' causing soft lockups under Xen

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 18:32 -0800, Steven Noonan wrote:
> [   88.517599]  [<ffffffff81085a86>] smp_call_function_single+0xec/0xfd

This looks like its waiting for an IPI to complete.. 

There's no actual BUGS or WARNs in the output, just the soft lockup
thing saying things are taking a bit of time (clearly 15s waiting for an
IPI isn't quite normal).

I've no idea why this wouldn't work on Xen, nor do the trace have any
Xen specific muck in them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/