[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyBAiZ3khqQiSU0OBafMABsAzdU5DLzZvaM_Et52Wte5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:28:27 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...era.com>,
Janne Kalliomäki <janne@...era.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Direct i/o changes break all non-GPL file systems
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> wrote:
>
> This doesn't affect me directly, since Lustre is itself a GPL filesystem,
> but it does seem a bit harsh for such a minor amount of functionality.
It also wasn't documented in the commit or apparently even intentional.
> Looking at inode_dio_wait(), there isn't anything in there that couldn't
> be implemented without using that GPL-only symbol export. Both inode_dio_wait()
> and __inode_dio_wait() use only functions that are themselves EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> (i.e. not GPL-only) and locally accessible structures (inode->i_dio_count
> and inode->i_state), so I don't see any benefit or reason in making
> inode_dio_wait() itself GPL.
Yes. I suspect we should just remove the _GPL part. Christoph, Al?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists