[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120210194227.GG4998@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:42:27 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] kernel: backtrace unwind support
Em Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 05:39:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:32:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > "Vote for --fno-omit-frame-pointer! One register is a cheap price to pay
> > > for not going insane!"
> > > /me goes back to non political things.
> > Even with -fomit-frame-pointer (which seems to be a big deal on Atom
> > in particular)
>
> Nah, on such register starved arches we just do what we do today: try to
> figure out bogus addresses and bail out.
And the "interesting" thing is that at least on:
[acme@...nha linux]$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
[acme@...nha linux]$ uname -p
i686
I have -fno-omit-frame-pointer and get nice callchains, but if I try it
on fedora x86_64... b00m. Go figure.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists