[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120210200051.GC20898@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:00:51 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] signal: oom_kill_task: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of
force_sig()
Change oom_kill_task() to use do_send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_FORCED)
instead of force_sig(SIGKILL). With the recent changes we do not
need force_ to kill the CLONE_NEWPID tasks.
And this is more correct. force_sig() can race with the exiting
thread even if oom_kill_task() checks p->mm != NULL, while
do_send_sig_info(group => true) kille the whole process.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 2958fd8..b1e9643 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -472,11 +472,11 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
pr_err("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
task_pid_nr(q), q->comm);
task_unlock(q);
- force_sig(SIGKILL, q);
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, q, true);
}
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
- force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists