[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3578FE.7030904@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:07:26 -0800
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: reset sleep/block start time on task switch
On 2/10/12 10:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:50 -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:
>> # perf record -agP -e sched:sched_switch --filter "prev_state == 1 ||
>> prev_state == 2" -e sched:sched_stat_sleep -- sleep 3
>
> Problem with that is it'll try and do a backtrace for all events, not
> only the sched_switch but also sched_stat_sleep, which is completely
> superfluous (and expensive).
>
> Currently perf tool doesn't support individual -g flags though and its
> slightly non-trivial to make it so. Easiest work-around would be two
> records and then merge the two files.
If we have a sequence of:
SL1, SW1, SL2, SW2, SL3, SW3
I think you're suggesting:
perf.data1: SL1, SL2, SL3 (without -g)
perf.data2: SW1, SW2, SW3 (with -g)
and then munge the data to create perf.data. But making sure that all
matching sleep and switch events are captured seems hard.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists