[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328907967.3138.1.camel@offbook>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:06:07 +0100
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] locks: export device name
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
The lslk(8) program has not been maintained for over a decade and has recently been rewritten as lslocks(8).
It will be available for the next 2.22 release, in a couple of months. This is a good opportunity to delete
that nasty WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW and start exporting the device name instead of the maj:min numbers.
For backward compatibility the new version can be in charge of checking older kernel versions and parsing the old
output if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
---
fs/locks.c | 7 -------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 637694b..2b01907 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2199,15 +2199,8 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
: (fl->fl_type & F_WRLCK) ? "WRITE" : "READ ");
}
if (inode) {
-#ifdef WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW
seq_printf(f, "%d %s:%ld ", fl_pid,
inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino);
-#else
- /* userspace relies on this representation of dev_t ;-( */
- seq_printf(f, "%d %02x:%02x:%ld ", fl_pid,
- MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
- MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), inode->i_ino);
-#endif
} else {
seq_printf(f, "%d <none>:0 ", fl_pid);
}
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists