[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120210222949.660791768@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:30:11 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [patch 52/86] lockdep, bug: Exclude TAINT_OOT_MODULE from disabling lock debugging
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
commit 9ec84acee1e221d99dc33237bff5e82839d10cc0 upstream.
We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules
that are not (yet) built in-tree. This was disabled as a
side-effect of commit 2449b8ba0745327c5fa49a8d9acffe03b2eded69
('module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built
in-tree'). Lock debug warnings now include taint flags, so
kernel developers should still be able to deflect warnings
caused by out-of-tree modules.
The TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE flag for non-GPL-compatible modules
will still disable lock debugging.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323268258.18450.11.camel@deadeye
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/panic.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -237,11 +237,12 @@ void add_taint(unsigned flag)
* Can't trust the integrity of the kernel anymore.
* We don't call directly debug_locks_off() because the issue
* is not necessarily serious enough to set oops_in_progress to 1
- * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging development and
- * post-warning case.
+ * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging/out-of-tree
+ * development and post-warning case.
*/
switch (flag) {
case TAINT_CRAP:
+ case TAINT_OOT_MODULE:
case TAINT_WARN:
case TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND:
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists