[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120210222948.498013237@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:58 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: [patch 39/86] udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d upstream.
When we hit EIO while writing LVID, the buffer uptodate bit is cleared.
This then results in an anoying warning from mark_buffer_dirty() when we
write the buffer again. So just set uptodate flag unconditionally.
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/udf/super.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -1799,6 +1799,12 @@ static void udf_close_lvid(struct super_
le16_to_cpu(lvid->descTag.descCRCLength)));
lvid->descTag.tagChecksum = udf_tag_checksum(&lvid->descTag);
+ /*
+ * We set buffer uptodate unconditionally here to avoid spurious
+ * warnings from mark_buffer_dirty() when previous EIO has marked
+ * the buffer as !uptodate
+ */
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists