| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120211203309.GA18093@albatros> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:33:09 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linun-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:19 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote: > > > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned. In the next > > > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate > > > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!) > > Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;) > > Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or > Documentation/ somewhere? Probably yes, but we haven't fully agreed on what are the formal criterias of k-h posting. Currently these are either discussion of not-yet-merged security features or general security problems of Linux. I guess we should more clearly state the role of k-h to place k-h in MAINTAINERS. Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists